CSRA vs IVV

CSRA vs IVV

Which is better, CSRA or IVV?

Allocation/Balanced against Large Cap Blend.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.5%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCSRAIVV
Expense Ratio0.80%0.03%Best
AUM$19M$882.6B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.06%
Holdings190508
YTD Return-2.35%+13.60%Best
1Y Return-+16.32%
3Y Return (annualized)-+23.81%
5Y Return (annualized)-+14.03%
Top 10 Weight50.5%38.1%Best
Fund FamilyCohen & Steers FundsiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryAllocation/BalancedEquity
StyleAllocation/BalancedLarge Cap Blend
InceptionAug 11, 2026May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

CSRA vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

CSRA vs IVV Performance

Cohen & Steers Real Assets Active ETF (CSRA) is an ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, CSRA is down 2.35% versus a gain of 13.60% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CSRA charges 0.80% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $3 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSRA currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

CSRA already in IVV25.1%
IVV already in CSRA5.5%

25.1% of CSRA's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 5.5% of IVV's money is in holdings CSRA also owns.

CSRA and IVV share little of their money.

53 positions in common, counted across the 190 positions we hold weights for in CSRA and 505 in IVV, against full books of 190 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 444 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for CSRA (93.7% of the fund), and 35 for CSRA that do not appear in IVV (49.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CSRAWeight in IVVDifference
WELLWelltower, Inc.2.83%0.25%2.58%
XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd1.07%1.04%0.03%
DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc.1.49%0.10%1.39%
WMBWilliams Cos. Inc.1.46%0.13%1.33%
PLDPrologis Inc1.26%0.19%1.07%
TRGPTarga Resources Corp Preferred1.06%0.09%0.97%
EQIXEquinix Inc. Real Estate Investment Trust1.00%0.15%0.85%
AMTAmerican Tower Corporation0.96%0.13%0.83%
ESSEssex Property0.82%0.03%0.79%
BGBunge Global Sa Common Shares0.80%0.03%0.77%

25.1% of CSRA is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

CSRAIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CSRA or IVV?

CSRA has an expense ratio of 0.80% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $77 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between CSRA and IVV?

25.1% of CSRA's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 5.5% of IVV's is in holdings CSRA also owns. They hold 53 positions in common, counted across the 190 positions we hold weights for in CSRA and 505 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, CSRA or IVV?

CSRA yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than CSRA?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.