CSRE vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTIMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCSREVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.70%0.03%
AUM$507M$663.5B
Dividend Yield0.63%1.07%
Holdings493,543
YTD Return+14.50%+14.20%
1Y Return+15.08%+24.16%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.12%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.37%
Volatility (annualized)12.5%15.3%
Max Drawdown-13.0%-56.6%
Fund FamilyCohen & Steers FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionFeb 3, 2025May 24, 2001

CSRE vs VTI Performance

Cohen & Steers Real Estate Active ETF (CSRE) is a ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CSRE returned +15.08% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, CSRE is up 14.50% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 12.5% for CSRE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.0% for CSRE and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CSRE charges 0.70% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CSRE currently yields 0.63% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

1.0%overlap

CSRE and VTI share 25 holdings out of 2806 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CSREWeight in VTIDifference
WELL13.72%0.22%13.50%
DLR8.38%0.09%8.29%
CCI7.79%0.05%7.74%
EQIXProProPro
PLDProProPro
EPRTProProPro
AKRProProPro
AMTProProPro
OUTProProPro
PSAProProPro
FundXLS Pro
See all 10 holdings CSRE shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
X-ray my whole portfolio$45/quarter Pro · Cancel anytime

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CSRE or VTI?

CSRE has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $67 per year of difference.

Which performed better, CSRE or VTI?

Over the past year CSRE returned +15.08% vs +24.16% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), CSRE annualized +11.98% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, CSRE or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 12.5% for CSRE. Worst drawdown: CSRE -13.0% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both CSRE and VTI?

CSRE and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between CSRE and VTI?

CSRE and VTI share 25 common holdings with a 1.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2806 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, CSRE or VTI?

CSRE yields 0.63% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.