CTEX vs VXUS
Proshares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. CTEX delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CTEX | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $5M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.67% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 32 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -7.03% | +14.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +48.01% | +27.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.83% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.14% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 42.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -70.3% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 29, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
CTEX vs VXUS Performance
Proshares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CTEX returned +48.01% while VXUS returned +27.24%. Year to date, CTEX is down 7.03% versus a gain of 14.07% for VXUS.
Over three years, CTEX compounded at +6.83% per year against +19.27% for VXUS. Across the full 5-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.83% annualized vs -2.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CTEX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 42.1% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -70.3% for CTEX and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CTEX charges 0.58% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $5 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CTEX currently yields 1.67% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
CTEX and VXUS share 3 holdings out of 7888 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CTEX or VXUS?
CTEX has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $53 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CTEX or VXUS?
Over the past year CTEX returned +48.01% vs +27.24% for VXUS, so CTEX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), CTEX annualized -2.57% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CTEX or VXUS?
CTEX has been the more volatile fund at 42.1% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: CTEX -70.3% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both CTEX and VXUS?
CTEX and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CTEX and VXUS?
CTEX and VXUS share 3 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7888 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CTEX or VXUS?
CTEX yields 1.67% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.