DDWM vs VTI
WisdomTree Dynamic International Equity Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DDWM | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.5B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.52% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 1,462 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +7.86% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.38% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.91% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.55% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 7, 2016 | May 24, 2001 |
DDWM vs VTI Performance
WisdomTree Dynamic International Equity Fund (DDWM) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DDWM returned +14.38% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, DDWM is up 7.86% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, DDWM compounded at +18.91% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +12.55% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, DDWM has the edge at +10.33% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 12.4% for DDWM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.0% for DDWM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DDWM charges 0.40% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DDWM currently yields 2.52% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
DDWM and VTI share 10 holdings out of 4015 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DDWM or VTI?
DDWM has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DDWM or VTI?
Over the past year DDWM returned +14.38% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), DDWM annualized +10.33% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DDWM or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 12.4% for DDWM. Worst drawdown: DDWM -35.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both DDWM and VTI?
DDWM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DDWM and VTI?
DDWM and VTI share 10 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 4015 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DDWM or VTI?
DDWM yields 2.52% while VTI yields 1.07%, so DDWM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.