DDWM vs IVV
WisdomTree Dynamic International Equity Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, DDWM or IVV?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. DDWM is less concentrated, with 11.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DDWM | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.5B | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.52% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 1,462 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +5.78% | +11.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.31% | +17.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.12% | +20.71%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.06% | +12.80%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.3%Best | 15.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.0% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,671 | $18,262Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 11.5%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 7, 2016 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 7, 2016 to Sep 10, 2026 (10.7 years).
DDWM vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.7 years both funds cover.
DDWM vs IVV Performance
WisdomTree Dynamic International Equity Fund (DDWM) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DDWM returned +12.31% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, DDWM is up 5.78% versus a gain of 11.57% for IVV.
Over three years, DDWM compounded at +17.12% per year against +20.71% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +12.06% and +12.80% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.43% annualized vs +10.07%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.3% for DDWM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.0% for DDWM and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DDWM charges 0.40% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DDWM currently yields 2.52% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
0.2% of DDWM's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings DDWM also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
2 positions in common, counted across the 1,447 positions we hold weights for in DDWM and 505 in IVV, against full books of 1,462 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 494 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for DDWM (99.3% of the fund), and 27 for DDWM that do not appear in IVV (4.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DDWM and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DDWM or IVV?
DDWM has an expense ratio of 0.40% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DDWM or IVV?
Over the past year DDWM returned +12.31% vs +17.57% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), DDWM annualized +10.07% vs +14.43% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DDWM or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.3% for DDWM. Worst drawdown: DDWM -35.0% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both DDWM and IVV?
DDWM and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DDWM or IVV?
DDWM yields 2.52% while IVV yields 1.06%, so DDWM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than DDWM?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. DDWM is less concentrated, with 11.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.