DDWM vs VYM
WisdomTree Dynamic International Equity Fund vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. DDWM offers more diversification with 1,462 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DDWM | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $1.5B | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.52% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 1,462 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +7.10% | +15.60% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.79% | +23.48% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.62% | +19.07% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.48% | +12.50% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.4% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.0% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 7, 2016 | Nov 10, 2006 |
DDWM vs VYM Performance
WisdomTree Dynamic International Equity Fund (DDWM) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DDWM returned +13.79% while VYM returned +23.48%. Year to date, DDWM is up 7.10% versus a gain of 15.60% for VYM.
Over three years, DDWM compounded at +18.62% per year against +19.07% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +12.48% and +12.50% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, DDWM has the edge at +10.26% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 12.4% for DDWM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.0% for DDWM and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DDWM charges 0.40% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $4 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DDWM currently yields 2.52% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
DDWM and VYM share 6 holdings out of 1835 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DDWM or VYM?
DDWM has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DDWM or VYM?
Over the past year DDWM returned +13.79% vs +23.48% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), DDWM annualized +10.26% vs +7.05% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DDWM or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 12.4% for DDWM. Worst drawdown: DDWM -35.0% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both DDWM and VYM?
DDWM and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DDWM and VYM?
DDWM and VYM share 6 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1835 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DDWM or VYM?
DDWM yields 2.52% while VYM yields 2.24%, so DDWM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.