DJAN vs GDEC
FT Vest US Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January vs FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December
Which is better, DJAN or GDEC?
Each has led over a different period.
DJAN led over the full window, GDEC over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DJAN | GDEC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85%Tie | 0.85%Tie |
| AUM | $451M | $383M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 10 | 10 |
| YTD Return | +8.30% | +8.79%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.85% | +12.26%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.69% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.14% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.3% | 5.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -9.3%Best | -10.6% |
| $10,000 over 2.8 years | $13,642Best | $13,632 |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Jan 15, 2021 | Dec 15, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 18, 2023 to Oct 13, 2026 (2.8 years).
DJAN vs GDEC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.8 years both funds cover.
DJAN vs GDEC Performance
FT Vest US Equity Deep Buffer ETF - January (DJAN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - December (GDEC) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year DJAN returned +11.85% while GDEC returned +12.26%. Year to date, DJAN is up 8.30% versus a gain of 8.79% for GDEC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DJAN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 5.3% compared with 5.2% for GDEC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.3% for DJAN and -10.6% for GDEC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DJAN charges 0.85% per year while GDEC charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $85 annually. On income, DJAN currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for GDEC.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DJAN and GDEC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DJAN or GDEC?
DJAN has an expense ratio of 0.85% while GDEC charges 0.85%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, DJAN or GDEC?
Over the past year DJAN returned +11.85% vs +12.26% for GDEC, so GDEC leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DJAN or GDEC?
DJAN has been the more volatile fund at 5.3% annualized versus 5.2% for GDEC. Worst drawdown: DJAN -9.3% vs GDEC -10.6%.
Should I hold both DJAN and GDEC?
DJAN and GDEC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, DJAN or GDEC?
DJAN yields 0.00% while GDEC yields 0.00%, so GDEC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GDEC better than DJAN?
DJAN led over the full window, GDEC over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.