DPST vs IVV
Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DPST delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DPST | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.92% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $439M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.55% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 161 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +46.95% | +13.43% | |
| 1Y Return | +80.81% | +22.61% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.86% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -18.00% | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 82.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -97.8% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 19, 2015 | May 15, 2000 |
DPST vs IVV Performance
Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X ETF (DPST) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DPST returned +80.81% while IVV returned +22.61%. Year to date, DPST is up 46.95% versus a gain of 13.43% for IVV.
Over three years, DPST compounded at +26.86% per year against +21.47% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -18.00% and +13.26% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs -13.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DPST has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 82.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -97.8% for DPST and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DPST charges 0.92% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $92 vs $3 annually, a gap of $89 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DPST currently yields 1.55% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
DPST and IVV share 5 holdings out of 665 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DPST or IVV?
DPST has an expense ratio of 0.92% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $89 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DPST or IVV?
Over the past year DPST returned +80.81% vs +22.61% for IVV, so DPST leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), DPST annualized -13.04% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DPST or IVV?
DPST has been the more volatile fund at 82.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DPST -97.8% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DPST and IVV?
DPST and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DPST and IVV?
DPST and IVV share 5 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 665 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DPST or IVV?
DPST yields 1.55% while IVV yields 1.09%, so DPST currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.