DQJN vs IVV
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Dual Directional Buffer ETF - June vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DQJN | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $16M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -1.34% | +12.39% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +20.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.78% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -5.8% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 18, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
DQJN vs IVV Performance
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Dual Directional Buffer ETF - June (DQJN) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, DQJN is down 1.34% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.8% for DQJN and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DQJN charges 0.90% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $3 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DQJN currently yields 0.00% against 1.10% for IVV.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DQJN or IVV?
DQJN has an expense ratio of 0.90% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $87 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, DQJN or IVV?
DQJN yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.