DQJN vs VYM
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Dual Directional Buffer ETF - June vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DQJN | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $16M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +0.45% | +16.42% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +24.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.03% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -5.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 18, 2026 | Nov 10, 2006 |
DQJN vs VYM Performance
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Dual Directional Buffer ETF - June (DQJN) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, DQJN is up 0.45% versus a gain of 16.42% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.8% for DQJN and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DQJN charges 0.90% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $4 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DQJN currently yields 0.00% against 2.24% for VYM.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DQJN or VYM?
DQJN has an expense ratio of 0.90% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $86 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, DQJN or VYM?
DQJN yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.