DQJN vs VOO
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Dual Directional Buffer ETF - June vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DQJN | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $16M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +0.45% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -5.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 18, 2026 | Sep 7, 2010 |
DQJN vs VOO Performance
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Dual Directional Buffer ETF - June (DQJN) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, DQJN is up 0.45% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.8% for DQJN and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DQJN charges 0.90% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $3 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DQJN currently yields 0.00% against 1.08% for VOO.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DQJN or VOO?
DQJN has an expense ratio of 0.90% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $87 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, DQJN or VOO?
DQJN yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.