DRES vs QQQ
GMO Domestic Resilience ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, DRES or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. DRES is less concentrated, with 38.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DRES | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $37M | $486.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.52% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 39 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +16.04% | +17.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | +21.76% | +25.59%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.63% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.18% |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.7%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | GMO | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 1, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
DRES vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
DRES vs QQQ Performance
GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES) is an ETF from GMO and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year DRES returned +21.76% while QQQ returned +25.59%. Year to date, DRES is up 16.04% versus a gain of 17.54% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DRES charges 0.50% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $18 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DRES currently yields 0.52% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
6.7% of DRES's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 0.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings DRES also owns.
DRES and QQQ share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in DRES and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 39 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 93 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for DRES (96.8% of the fund), and 34 for DRES that do not appear in QQQ (89.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DRES and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DRES or QQQ?
DRES has an expense ratio of 0.50% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DRES or QQQ?
Over the past year DRES returned +21.76% vs +25.59% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DRES and QQQ?
6.7% of DRES's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 0.8% of QQQ's is in holdings DRES also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in DRES and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, DRES or QQQ?
DRES yields 0.52% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so DRES currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than DRES?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. DRES is less concentrated, with 38.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.