DRNZ vs QQQ
REX Drone ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, DRNZ or QQQ?
QQQ costs less.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 65.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DRNZ | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $113M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 54 | 107 |
| YTD Return | -11.42% | +16.87%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +22.98% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.98% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.39% |
| Top 10 Weight | 65.9% | 46.5%Best |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 29, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
DRNZ vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
DRNZ vs QQQ Performance
REX Drone ETF (DRNZ) is an ETF from REX Shares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, DRNZ is down 11.42% versus a gain of 16.87% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DRNZ charges 0.65% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $18 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DRNZ currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
5.3% of DRNZ's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 2.7% of QQQ's money is in holdings DRNZ also owns.
DRNZ and QQQ share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 47 positions we hold weights for in DRNZ and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 54 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 91 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for DRNZ (94.4% of the fund), and 21 for DRNZ that do not appear in QQQ (57.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DRNZ and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DRNZ or QQQ?
DRNZ has an expense ratio of 0.65% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between DRNZ and QQQ?
5.3% of DRNZ's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 2.7% of QQQ's is in holdings DRNZ also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 47 positions we hold weights for in DRNZ and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, DRNZ or QQQ?
DRNZ yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than DRNZ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 65.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.