DRNZ vs VTI
REX Drone ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, DRNZ or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DRNZ | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $113M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 54 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -12.14% | +11.65%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.34% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.35% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.72% |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 29, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
DRNZ vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
DRNZ vs VTI Performance
REX Drone ETF (DRNZ) is an ETF from REX Shares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, DRNZ is down 12.14% versus a gain of 11.65% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DRNZ charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DRNZ currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 47.2% of DRNZ's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
23 positions in common, counted across the 47 positions we hold weights for in DRNZ and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 54 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DRNZ | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVAVAerovironment Inc | 15.52% | 0.00% | 15.52% |
| RCATRed Cat Holdings Inc | 4.82% | 0.00% | 4.82% |
| UMACUnusual Machines Inc /Us | 4.72% | 0.00% | 4.72% |
| AVEXAevex Corp Class A | 3.79% | 0.00% | 3.79% |
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 2.47% | 0.54% | 1.93% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 2.47% | 0.35% | 2.12% |
| RTXRtx Corp. | 1.94% | 0.35% | 1.59% |
| APPApplovin Corp., Class 'A' | 1.52% | 0.19% | 1.33% |
| AIROAiro Group Holdings Inc | 1.49% | 0.00% | 1.49% |
| BABoeing Co | 1.18% | 0.23% | 0.95% |
47.2% of DRNZ is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DRNZ or VTI?
DRNZ has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between DRNZ and VTI?
At least 47.2% of DRNZ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 23 positions in common, counted across the 47 positions we hold weights for in DRNZ and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, DRNZ or VTI?
DRNZ yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than DRNZ?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.