DRNZ vs IVV
REX Drone ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, DRNZ or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 72.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DRNZ | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $83M | $850.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% |
| Holdings | 101 | 1,018 |
| YTD Return | -31.84% | +12.12%Best |
| 1Y Return | -26.16% | +12.53%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.93% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 41.7% | 12.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -53.3% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $6,594 | $11,137Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 72.0% | 38.8%Best |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 29, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 29, 2025 to Nov 11, 2026 (1 years).
DRNZ vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
DRNZ vs IVV Performance
REX Drone ETF (DRNZ) is an ETF from REX Shares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DRNZ returned -26.16% while IVV returned +12.53%. Year to date, DRNZ is down 31.84% versus a gain of 12.12% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DRNZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 41.7% compared with 12.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.3% for DRNZ and -8.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DRNZ charges 0.65% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DRNZ currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
16.1% of DRNZ's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 2.5% of IVV's money is in holdings DRNZ also owns.
DRNZ and IVV share little of their money.
13 positions in common, counted across the 45 positions we hold weights for in DRNZ and 505 in IVV, against full books of 101 and 1,018.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 486 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for DRNZ (97.1% of the fund), and 12 for DRNZ that do not appear in IVV (47.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DRNZ | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc. | 3.83% | 0.69% | 3.14% |
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 2.79% | 0.48% | 2.31% |
| RTXRtx Corp. | 2.18% | 0.38% | 1.80% |
| BABoeing Co | 1.29% | 0.22% | 1.07% |
| LMTLockheed Martin | 1.06% | 0.16% | 0.90% |
| HWMHowmet Aerospace | 0.75% | 0.13% | 0.62% |
| TDGTransdigm Group Inc. | 0.62% | 0.09% | 0.53% |
| NOCNorthrop Grumman Corp. | 0.61% | 0.10% | 0.51% |
| LHXL3Harris Technologies Inc. | 0.61% | 0.07% | 0.54% |
| HONAHoneywell Aerospace Inc | 0.60% | 0.07% | 0.53% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DRNZ and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DRNZ or IVV?
DRNZ has an expense ratio of 0.65% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DRNZ or IVV?
Over the past year DRNZ returned -26.16% vs +12.53% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), DRNZ annualized -34.06% vs +11.37% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DRNZ or IVV?
DRNZ has been the more volatile fund at 41.7% annualized versus 12.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DRNZ -53.3% vs IVV -8.9%.
Should I hold both DRNZ and IVV?
DRNZ and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DRNZ and IVV?
16.1% of DRNZ's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 2.5% of IVV's is in holdings DRNZ also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 45 positions we hold weights for in DRNZ and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, DRNZ or IVV?
DRNZ yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than DRNZ?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 72.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.