DTAN vs IVV
Sparkline International Intangible Value ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DTAN | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $22M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.70% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 123 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +10.13% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.68% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Sparkline Capital | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 9, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
DTAN vs IVV Performance
Sparkline International Intangible Value ETF (DTAN) is a ETF from Sparkline Capital and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DTAN returned +18.68% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, DTAN is up 10.13% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.8% for DTAN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.6% for DTAN and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DTAN charges 0.55% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DTAN currently yields 2.70% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
DTAN and IVV share 3 holdings out of 614 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DTAN or IVV?
DTAN has an expense ratio of 0.55% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DTAN or IVV?
Over the past year DTAN returned +18.68% vs +21.89% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), DTAN annualized +20.02% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DTAN or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.8% for DTAN. Worst drawdown: DTAN -17.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DTAN and IVV?
DTAN and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DTAN and IVV?
DTAN and IVV share 3 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 614 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DTAN or IVV?
DTAN yields 2.70% while IVV yields 1.10%, so DTAN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.