DTCR vs VYM
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. DTCR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DTCR | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $2.2B | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.90% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 29 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +30.23% | +14.66% | |
| 1Y Return | +53.60% | +22.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +32.01% | +18.72% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.80% | +12.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.9% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.0% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 27, 2020 | Nov 10, 2006 |
DTCR vs VYM Performance
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DTCR returned +53.60% while VYM returned +22.16%. Year to date, DTCR is up 30.23% versus a gain of 14.66% for VYM.
Over three years, DTCR compounded at +32.01% per year against +18.72% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +11.80% and +12.18% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, DTCR has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DTCR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.9% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.0% for DTCR and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DTCR charges 0.50% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $4 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DTCR currently yields 0.90% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
DTCR and VYM share 3 holdings out of 625 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DTCR or VYM?
DTCR has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DTCR or VYM?
Over the past year DTCR returned +53.60% vs +22.16% for VYM, so DTCR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), DTCR annualized +13.58% vs +7.01% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DTCR or VYM?
DTCR has been the more volatile fund at 22.9% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: DTCR -39.0% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both DTCR and VYM?
DTCR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DTCR and VYM?
DTCR and VYM share 3 common holdings with a 2.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 625 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DTCR or VYM?
DTCR yields 0.90% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.