DTCR vs IVV
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, DTCR or IVV?
Each has led over a different period.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DTCR led over 1Y and 3Y, IVV over 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 71.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DTCR | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2.1B | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.89% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 28 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +29.22%Best | +12.51% |
| 1Y Return | +45.35%Best | +17.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +30.27%Best | +21.27% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.34% | +12.95%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.7% | 15.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -39.0% | -24.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,110 | $18,384Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 71.7% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 27, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 29, 2020 to Sep 11, 2026 (5.9 years).
DTCR vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.9 years both funds cover.
DTCR vs IVV Performance
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DTCR returned +45.35% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, DTCR is up 29.22% versus a gain of 12.51% for IVV.
Over three years, DTCR compounded at +30.27% per year against +21.27% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +11.34% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +16.93% annualized vs +13.29%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DTCR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.7% compared with 15.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.0% for DTCR and -24.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DTCR charges 0.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DTCR currently yields 0.89% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
69.5% of DTCR's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 15.3% of IVV's money is in holdings DTCR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
14 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in DTCR and 505 in IVV, against full books of 28 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 481 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for DTCR (84.0% of the fund), and 2 for DTCR that do not appear in IVV (7.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DTCR | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMTAmerican Tower Corp | 12.77% | 0.12% | 12.65% |
| DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc. | 12.73% | 0.10% | 12.63% |
| EQIXEquinix, Inc. | 12.29% | 0.16% | 12.13% |
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 2.09% | 7.98% | 5.89% |
| CCICrown Castle International Corp | 8.76% | 0.05% | 8.71% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.91% | 2.98% | 1.07% |
| SBACSba Communications Corp. | 4.63% | 0.03% | 4.60% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.10% | 1.51% | 0.59% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. | 1.77% | 1.18% | 0.59% |
| SMCISuper Micro Computer Inc | 2.78% | 0.03% | 2.75% |
69.5% of DTCR is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DTCR or IVV?
DTCR has an expense ratio of 0.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DTCR or IVV?
Over the past year DTCR returned +45.35% vs +17.57% for IVV, so DTCR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), DTCR annualized +13.29% vs +16.93% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DTCR or IVV?
DTCR has been the more volatile fund at 22.7% annualized versus 15.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DTCR -39.0% vs IVV -24.5%.
Should I hold both DTCR and IVV?
DTCR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DTCR and IVV?
69.5% of DTCR's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 15.3% of IVV's is in holdings DTCR also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in DTCR and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, DTCR or IVV?
DTCR yields 0.89% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than DTCR?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DTCR led over 1Y and 3Y, IVV over 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 71.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.