DTCR vs IVV
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DTCR delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DTCR | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.2B | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.90% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 29 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +29.50% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +53.88% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +31.56% | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.59% | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 27, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
DTCR vs IVV Performance
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DTCR returned +53.88% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, DTCR is up 29.50% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Over three years, DTCR compounded at +31.56% per year against +22.08% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +11.59% and +12.96% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, DTCR has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs +7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DTCR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.0% for DTCR and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DTCR charges 0.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DTCR currently yields 0.90% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
DTCR and IVV share 14 holdings out of 516 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DTCR or IVV?
DTCR has an expense ratio of 0.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DTCR or IVV?
Over the past year DTCR returned +53.88% vs +21.89% for IVV, so DTCR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), DTCR annualized +13.47% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DTCR or IVV?
DTCR has been the more volatile fund at 22.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DTCR -39.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DTCR and IVV?
DTCR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DTCR and IVV?
DTCR and IVV share 14 common holdings with a 8.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 516 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DTCR or IVV?
DTCR yields 0.90% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.