DTCR vs QQQ
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. DTCR delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DTCR | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $2.2B | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.90% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 29 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +29.50% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +53.88% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +31.56% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.59% | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.9% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.0% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 27, 2020 | Mar 10, 1999 |
DTCR vs QQQ Performance
Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year DTCR returned +53.88% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, DTCR is up 29.50% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, DTCR compounded at +31.56% per year against +25.96% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +11.59% and +14.54% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, DTCR has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs +13.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 22.9% for DTCR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.0% for DTCR and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DTCR charges 0.50% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $18 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DTCR currently yields 0.90% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
DTCR and QQQ share 7 holdings out of 120 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DTCR or QQQ?
DTCR has an expense ratio of 0.50% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DTCR or QQQ?
Over the past year DTCR returned +53.88% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so DTCR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), DTCR annualized +13.47% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DTCR or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 22.9% for DTCR. Worst drawdown: DTCR -39.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both DTCR and QQQ?
DTCR and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DTCR and QQQ?
DTCR and QQQ share 7 common holdings with a 10.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 120 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DTCR or QQQ?
DTCR yields 0.90% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so DTCR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.