DUSG vs VTI

DUSG vs VTI

Which is better, DUSG or VTI?

Small Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. DUSG led over 1Y. DUSG is less concentrated, with 6.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns (1Y): DUSGLess Concentrated: DUSG

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDUSGVTI
Expense Ratio0.32%0.03%Best
AUM$2.0B$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.14%1.03%
Holdings5473,543
YTD Return+0.67%+12.08%Best
1Y Return-+16.31%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.83%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.89%
Top 10 Weight6.6%Best33.3%
Fund FamilyDimensionalVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleSmall Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMay 6, 2026May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

DUSG vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

DUSG vs VTI Performance

US Small Cap Growth ETF (DUSG) is an ETF from Dimensional and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, DUSG is up 0.67% versus a gain of 12.08% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

DUSG charges 0.32% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $32 vs $3 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DUSG currently yields 0.14% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

DUSG already in VTI95.3%
VTI already in DUSG3.2%

95.3% of DUSG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 3.2% of VTI's money is in holdings DUSG also owns.

Most of DUSG is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

522 positions in common, counted across the 544 positions we hold weights for in DUSG and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 547 and 3,543.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 881 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for DUSG (94.2% of the fund), and 16 for DUSG that do not appear in VTI (2.2%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in DUSGWeight in VTIDifference
HALOHalozyme Therapeutics Inc0.78%0.01%0.77%
MEDPMedpace Holdings Inc0.74%0.02%0.72%
EXELExelixis Inc0.69%0.02%0.67%
CCKCrown Holdings Inc.0.69%0.02%0.67%
MANHManhattan Associates Inc0.65%0.02%0.63%
FIVEFive Below0.64%0.02%0.62%
IESCIes Holdings, Inc.0.62%0.01%0.61%
ALLEAllegion Plc0.60%0.02%0.58%
STRLSterling Construction Company Inc0.60%0.02%0.58%
TXRHTexas Roadhouse Inc0.58%0.02%0.56%

95.3% of DUSG is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

DUSGVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DUSG or VTI?

DUSG has an expense ratio of 0.32% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between DUSG and VTI?

95.3% of DUSG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 3.2% of VTI's is in holdings DUSG also owns. They hold 522 positions in common, counted across the 544 positions we hold weights for in DUSG and 3,463 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, DUSG or VTI?

DUSG yields 0.14% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than DUSG?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. DUSG led over 1Y. DUSG is less concentrated, with 6.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.