DXYZ vs QQQ

DXYZ vs QQQ

Which is better, DXYZ or QQQ?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. DXYZ led over the full window, QQQ over 1Y.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDXYZQQQ
Expense Ratio6.28%0.18%Best
AUM-$483.5B
Dividend Yield-0.44%
Holdings39107
YTD Return+2.07%+15.94%Best
1Y Return+17.62%+20.44%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+24.86%
5Y Return (annualized)-+14.26%
Volatility (annualized)198.9%17.7%Best
Max Drawdown-90.3%-22.8%Best
$10,000 over 2.5 years$35,627Best$16,285
Fund FamilyDestiny AdvisorsInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionMar 26, 2024Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 26, 2024 to Sep 14, 2026 (2.5 years).

DXYZ vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.

DXYZ vs QQQ Performance

Destiny Tech100 Inc (DXYZ) is an ETF from Destiny Advisors and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year DXYZ returned +17.62% while QQQ returned +20.44%. Year to date, DXYZ is up 2.07% versus a gain of 15.94% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

DXYZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 198.9% compared with 17.7% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -90.3% for DXYZ and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.31. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

DXYZ charges 6.28% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $628 vs $18 annually, a gap of $610 per year that compounds over a long holding period.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 6 holdings in DXYZ and 102 in QQQ, totalling 48.1% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

The two holdings books were reported 217 days apart, DXYZ as of Dec 31, 2025 and QQQ as of Aug 5, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

0 positions in common, counted across the 6 positions we hold weights for in DXYZ and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 39 and 107.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of DXYZ and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

DXYZQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DXYZ or QQQ?

DXYZ has an expense ratio of 6.28% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $610 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, DXYZ or QQQ?

Over the past year DXYZ returned +17.62% vs +20.44% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, DXYZ or QQQ?

DXYZ has been the more volatile fund at 198.9% annualized versus 17.7% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: DXYZ -90.3% vs QQQ -22.8%.

Should I hold both DXYZ and QQQ?

DXYZ and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.31, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Is QQQ better than DXYZ?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. DXYZ led over the full window, QQQ over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.