DYTA vs EATZ
SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF vs AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
Which is better, DYTA or EATZ?
Each has led over a different period.
EATZ has a lower expense ratio. DYTA led over 1Y, EATZ over the full window. DYTA is less concentrated, with 41.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DYTA | EATZ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.32% | 1.00%Best |
| AUM | $107M | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.54% | 0.48% |
| Holdings | 140 | 22 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.4%Best | 19.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -9.7%Best | -23.2% |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $13,616 | $13,971Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.9%Best | 61.2% |
| Fund Family | Summit Global Investments | Advisor Shares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | All Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 30, 2023 | Apr 20, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 195 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. DYTA has data through Nov 11, 2026 and EATZ through Apr 30, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 30, 2023 to Apr 30, 2026 (3.1 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EATZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.7% compared with 10.4% for DYTA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.7% for DYTA and -23.2% for EATZ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DYTA charges 1.32% per year while EATZ charges 1.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $132 vs $100 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DYTA currently yields 1.54% against 0.48% for EATZ.
Holdings Overlap
0.2% of DYTA's money is in holdings EATZ also owns. 4.6% of EATZ's money is in holdings DYTA also owns.
EATZ and DYTA share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 262 days apart, DYTA as of Oct 19, 2026 and EATZ as of Jan 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 132 positions we hold weights for in DYTA and 22 in EATZ, against full books of 140 and 22.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 20 positions for EATZ that do not appear in our book for DYTA (94.8% of the fund), and 131 for DYTA that do not appear in EATZ (99.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DYTA | Weight in EATZ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMGChipotle Mexican Grill Inc. Class A | 0.20% | 4.64% | 4.44% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DYTA and EATZ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DYTA or EATZ?
DYTA has an expense ratio of 1.32% while EATZ charges 1.00%. EATZ is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, DYTA or EATZ?
EATZ has been the more volatile fund at 19.7% annualized versus 10.4% for DYTA. Worst drawdown: DYTA -9.7% vs EATZ -23.2%.
Should I hold both DYTA and EATZ?
DYTA and EATZ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DYTA and EATZ?
4.6% of EATZ's money is in holdings DYTA also owns. 4.6% of EATZ's is in holdings DYTA also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 132 positions we hold weights for in DYTA and 22 in EATZ.
Which pays a higher dividend, DYTA or EATZ?
DYTA yields 1.54% while EATZ yields 0.48%, so DYTA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is EATZ better than DYTA?
EATZ has a lower expense ratio. DYTA led over 1Y, EATZ over the full window. DYTA is less concentrated, with 41.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.