EART vs IVV
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, EART or IVV?
All Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EART led over 1Y and 3Y, IVV over the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EART | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $45M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.69% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 57 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +9.52% | +12.70%Best |
| 1Y Return | +43.72%Best | +19.36% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.38%Best | +21.16% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.75% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 32.6% | 15.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -53.7% | -22.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.6 years | $13,965 | $18,778Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.5% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 24, 2022 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 26, 2022 to Sep 8, 2026 (4.6 years).
EART vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.6 years both funds cover.
EART vs IVV Performance
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EART returned +43.72% while IVV returned +19.36%. Year to date, EART is up 9.52% versus a gain of 12.70% for IVV.
Over three years, EART compounded at +24.38% per year against +21.16% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EART has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.6% compared with 15.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.7% for EART and -22.1% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EART charges 0.59% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EART currently yields 0.69% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
8.2% of EART's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.2% of IVV's money is in holdings EART also owns.
EART and IVV share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in EART and 504 in IVV, against full books of 57 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 491 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for EART (99.0% of the fund), and 7 for EART that do not appear in IVV (19.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EART and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EART or IVV?
EART has an expense ratio of 0.59% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EART or IVV?
Over the past year EART returned +43.72% vs +19.36% for IVV, so EART leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EART or IVV?
EART has been the more volatile fund at 32.6% annualized versus 15.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EART -53.7% vs IVV -22.1%.
Should I hold both EART and IVV?
EART and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EART and IVV?
8.2% of EART's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.2% of IVV's is in holdings EART also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in EART and 504 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, EART or IVV?
EART yields 0.69% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than EART?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EART led over 1Y and 3Y, IVV over the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.