EART vs VOO
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. EART delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EART | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $38M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.65% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 54 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +7.03% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +57.79% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.82% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 32.6% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 24, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
EART vs VOO Performance
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EART returned +57.79% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, EART is up 7.03% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Over three years, EART compounded at +21.82% per year against +21.47% for VOO. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs +7.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EART has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.7% for EART and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EART charges 0.59% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EART currently yields 0.65% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EART or VOO?
EART has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EART or VOO?
Over the past year EART returned +57.79% vs +22.62% for VOO, so EART leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), EART annualized +7.12% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EART or VOO?
EART has been the more volatile fund at 32.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: EART -53.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both EART and VOO?
EART and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EART and VOO?
EART and VOO share 2 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 552 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EART or VOO?
EART yields 0.65% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.