EART vs VTI
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, EART or VTI?
All Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EART led over 3Y, VTI over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EART | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $42M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.60% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 57 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -1.57% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.95% | +15.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.29%Best | +23.41% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.83% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 32.8% | 15.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -53.7% | -22.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.7 years | $12,577 | $18,535Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 45.5% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | All Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 24, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 26, 2022 to Oct 2, 2026 (4.7 years).
EART vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.7 years both funds cover.
EART vs VTI Performance
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EART returned +13.95% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, EART is down 1.57% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Over three years, EART compounded at +24.29% per year against +23.41% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EART has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.8% compared with 15.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.7% for EART and -22.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EART charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EART currently yields 0.60% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
13.6% of EART's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.2% of VTI's money is in holdings EART also owns.
EART and VTI share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, EART as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
6 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in EART and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 57 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,146 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for EART (97.3% of the fund), and 2 for EART that do not appear in VTI (9.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EART and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EART or VTI?
EART has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EART or VTI?
Over the past year EART returned +13.95% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EART or VTI?
EART has been the more volatile fund at 32.8% annualized versus 15.7% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EART -53.7% vs VTI -22.4%.
Should I hold both EART and VTI?
EART and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EART and VTI?
13.6% of EART's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.2% of VTI's is in holdings EART also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in EART and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, EART or VTI?
EART yields 0.60% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than EART?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EART led over 3Y, VTI over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.