EART vs VTI
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EART delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EART | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $42M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.69% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 54 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +7.01% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +57.26% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.74% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 32.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 24, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
EART vs VTI Performance
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EART returned +57.26% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, EART is up 7.01% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, EART compounded at +23.74% per year against +21.54% for VTI. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs +7.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EART has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.7% for EART and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EART charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EART currently yields 0.69% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
EART and VTI share 11 holdings out of 2825 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EART or VTI?
EART has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EART or VTI?
Over the past year EART returned +57.26% vs +21.39% for VTI, so EART leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), EART annualized +7.08% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EART or VTI?
EART has been the more volatile fund at 32.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EART -53.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EART and VTI?
EART and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EART and VTI?
EART and VTI share 11 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2825 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EART or VTI?
EART yields 0.69% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.