EDEN vs IVV
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, EDEN or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EDEN led over the full window, IVV over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDEN | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.53% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $193M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.93% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 47 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -0.93% | +12.27%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.53% | +17.04%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.14% | +21.24%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.76% | +13.08%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 627.8% | 15.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -36.6% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,912 | $18,490Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 63.9% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 25, 2012 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 22, 2008 to Sep 17, 2026 (17.9 years).
EDEN vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
EDEN vs IVV Performance
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EDEN returned +3.53% while IVV returned +17.04%. Year to date, EDEN is down 0.93% versus a gain of 12.27% for IVV.
Over three years, EDEN compounded at +5.14% per year against +21.24% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +1.76% and +13.08% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, EDEN has the edge at +33.72% annualized vs +13.17%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EDEN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 627.8% compared with 15.0% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.6% for EDEN and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.08. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDEN charges 0.53% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $53 vs $3 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDEN currently yields 2.93% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings EDEN also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in EDEN and 490 in IVV, against full books of 47 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 481 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for EDEN (98.5% of the fund), and 0 for EDEN that do not appear in IVV (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EDEN | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XTSLABlackrock Cash Funds: Treasury, Sl Agency Shares | 0.04% | 0.15% | 0.11% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EDEN and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDEN or IVV?
EDEN has an expense ratio of 0.53% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $50 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EDEN or IVV?
Over the past year EDEN returned +3.53% vs +17.04% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), EDEN annualized +33.72% vs +13.17% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EDEN or IVV?
EDEN has been the more volatile fund at 627.8% annualized versus 15.0% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EDEN -36.6% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both EDEN and IVV?
EDEN and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.08, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDEN or IVV?
EDEN yields 2.93% while IVV yields 1.06%, so EDEN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than EDEN?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EDEN led over the full window, IVV over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.