EDEN vs VXUS
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, EDEN or VXUS?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. EDEN led over the full window, VXUS over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDEN | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.53% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $193M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.93% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 47 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | -4.37% | +12.44%Best |
| 1Y Return | +0.89% | +20.21%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.50% | +19.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.99% | +8.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.4% | 15.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -36.6%Best | -39.9% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,505 | $15,379Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 25, 2012 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 26, 2012 to Sep 24, 2026 (15.7 years).
EDEN vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 15.7 years both funds cover.
EDEN vs VXUS Performance
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EDEN returned +0.89% while VXUS returned +20.21%. Year to date, EDEN is down 4.37% versus a gain of 12.44% for VXUS.
Over three years, EDEN compounded at +4.50% per year against +19.97% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +0.99% and +8.99% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, EDEN has the edge at +11.82% annualized vs +4.69%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EDEN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 15.0% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.6% for EDEN and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.14. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDEN charges 0.53% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $53 vs $5 annually, a gap of $48 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDEN currently yields 2.93% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 59.1% of EDEN's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 88.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
28 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in EDEN and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 47 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EDEN | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| DSV:CODsv A/s | 8.37% | 0.09% | 8.28% |
| DANSKE:CODanske Bank As | 7.22% | 0.08% | 7.14% |
| VWS:COVestas Wind Systems A/S Shs New | 6.52% | 0.06% | 6.46% |
| NSIS.B:CONovonesis (Novozymes) B | 4.92% | 0.05% | 4.87% |
| ORSTED:COOrsted A/S | 2.75% | 0.02% | 2.73% |
| MAERSK.B:COA.p.moller Maersk A/s B | 2.65% | 0.02% | 2.63% |
| PNDORA:COPandora A/s | 2.57% | 0.02% | 2.55% |
| NKT:CONkt A/s | 2.12% | 0.02% | 2.10% |
| TRYG:COTryg A/S | 2.11% | 0.02% | 2.09% |
| JYSK:COJyske Bank A/s | 2.07% | 0.01% | 2.06% |
59.1% of EDEN is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDEN or VXUS?
EDEN has an expense ratio of 0.53% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $48 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EDEN or VXUS?
Over the past year EDEN returned +0.89% vs +20.21% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), EDEN annualized +11.82% vs +4.69% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EDEN or VXUS?
EDEN has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 15.0% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: EDEN -36.6% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both EDEN and VXUS?
EDEN and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.14, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EDEN and VXUS?
At least 59.1% of EDEN's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 28 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in EDEN and 8,082 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDEN or VXUS?
EDEN yields 2.93% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so EDEN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than EDEN?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. EDEN led over the full window, VXUS over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.