EDEN vs VXUS
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDEN | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.53% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $195M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.97% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 47 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +0.89% | +13.91% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.60% | +25.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.49% | +19.76% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.65% | +8.82% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 627.8% | 15.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -36.6% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 25, 2012 | Jan 26, 2011 |
EDEN vs VXUS Performance
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EDEN returned +8.60% while VXUS returned +25.90%. Year to date, EDEN is up 0.89% versus a gain of 13.91% for VXUS.
Over three years, EDEN compounded at +5.49% per year against +19.76% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +1.65% and +8.82% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, EDEN has the edge at +33.95% annualized vs +4.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EDEN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 627.8% compared with 15.0% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.6% for EDEN and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.14. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDEN charges 0.53% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $53 vs $5 annually, a gap of $48 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDEN currently yields 2.97% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
EDEN and VXUS share 27 holdings out of 8108 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDEN or VXUS?
EDEN has an expense ratio of 0.53% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $48 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EDEN or VXUS?
Over the past year EDEN returned +8.60% vs +25.90% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), EDEN annualized +33.95% vs +4.80% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EDEN or VXUS?
EDEN has been the more volatile fund at 627.8% annualized versus 15.0% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: EDEN -36.6% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both EDEN and VXUS?
EDEN and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.14, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EDEN and VXUS?
EDEN and VXUS share 27 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8108 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDEN or VXUS?
EDEN yields 2.97% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so EDEN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.