EDEN vs VYM
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, EDEN or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. EDEN led over the full window, VYM over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDEN | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.53% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $193M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.93% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 47 | 613 |
| YTD Return | -1.19% | +11.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +2.08% | +15.34%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.03% | +17.22%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.12% | +12.30%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 627.8% | 14.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -36.6%Best | -38.5% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,106 | $17,861Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 63.9% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jan 25, 2012 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 22, 2008 to Sep 18, 2026 (17.9 years).
EDEN vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
EDEN vs VYM Performance
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EDEN returned +2.08% while VYM returned +15.34%. Year to date, EDEN is down 1.19% versus a gain of 11.35% for VYM.
Over three years, EDEN compounded at +5.03% per year against +17.22% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +2.12% and +12.30% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, EDEN has the edge at +33.70% annualized vs +10.01%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EDEN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 627.8% compared with 14.3% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.6% for EDEN and -38.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.03. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDEN charges 0.53% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $53 vs $4 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDEN currently yields 2.93% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 41 holdings in EDEN and 557 in VYM, totalling 98.3% and 99.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in EDEN and 557 in VYM, against full books of 47 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 528 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for EDEN (97.1% of the fund), and 1 for EDEN that do not appear in VYM (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EDEN and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDEN or VYM?
EDEN has an expense ratio of 0.53% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $49 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EDEN or VYM?
Over the past year EDEN returned +2.08% vs +15.34% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), EDEN annualized +33.70% vs +10.01% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EDEN or VYM?
EDEN has been the more volatile fund at 627.8% annualized versus 14.3% for VYM. Worst drawdown: EDEN -36.6% vs VYM -38.5%.
Should I hold both EDEN and VYM?
EDEN and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.03, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDEN or VYM?
EDEN yields 2.93% while VYM yields 2.22%, so EDEN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than EDEN?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. EDEN led over the full window, VYM over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.