EDEN vs VYM
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 568 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDEN | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.53% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $201M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.12% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 46 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -0.17% | +16.78% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.61% | +24.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.28% | +18.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.54% | +12.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 629.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -36.6% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 25, 2012 | Nov 10, 2006 |
EDEN vs VYM Performance
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EDEN returned +8.61% while VYM returned +24.43%. Year to date, EDEN is down 0.17% versus a gain of 16.78% for VYM.
Over three years, EDEN compounded at +4.28% per year against +18.60% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +1.54% and +12.30% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, EDEN has the edge at +33.99% annualized vs +7.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EDEN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 629.5% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.6% for EDEN and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.03. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDEN charges 0.53% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $53 vs $4 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDEN currently yields 3.12% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
EDEN and VYM share 0 holdings out of 599 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDEN or VYM?
EDEN has an expense ratio of 0.53% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $49 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EDEN or VYM?
Over the past year EDEN returned +8.61% vs +24.43% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), EDEN annualized +33.99% vs +7.11% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EDEN or VYM?
EDEN has been the more volatile fund at 629.5% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: EDEN -36.6% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both EDEN and VYM?
EDEN and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.03, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EDEN and VYM?
EDEN and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 599 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDEN or VYM?
EDEN yields 3.12% while VYM yields 2.86%, so EDEN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.