EDEN vs SCHD
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDEN | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.53% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $190M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.97% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 46 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +0.00% | +26.50% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.66% | +31.25% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.57% | +16.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.52% | +10.10% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 629.5% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -36.6% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 25, 2012 | Oct 20, 2011 |
EDEN vs SCHD Performance
iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year EDEN returned +7.66% while SCHD returned +31.25%. Year to date, EDEN is up 0.00% versus a gain of 26.50% for SCHD.
Over three years, EDEN compounded at +4.57% per year against +16.34% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +1.52% and +10.10% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, EDEN has the edge at +33.97% annualized vs +11.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EDEN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 629.5% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.6% for EDEN and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.03. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDEN charges 0.53% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $53 vs $6 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDEN currently yields 2.97% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
EDEN and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 141 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDEN or SCHD?
EDEN has an expense ratio of 0.53% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EDEN or SCHD?
Over the past year EDEN returned +7.66% vs +31.25% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), EDEN annualized +33.97% vs +11.50% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EDEN or SCHD?
EDEN has been the more volatile fund at 629.5% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: EDEN -36.6% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both EDEN and SCHD?
EDEN and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.03, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EDEN and SCHD?
EDEN and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 141 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDEN or SCHD?
EDEN yields 2.97% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.