EFZ vs IVV
ProShares Short MSCI EAFE vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EFZ | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $10M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.98% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -11.20% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | -16.15% | +21.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -11.90% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -6.44% | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -90.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2007 | May 15, 2000 |
EFZ vs IVV Performance
ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ) is a ETF from ProShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EFZ returned -16.15% while IVV returned +21.64%. Year to date, EFZ is down 11.20% versus a gain of 13.72% for IVV.
Over three years, EFZ compounded at -11.90% per year against +21.55% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -6.44% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs -8.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EFZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -90.3% for EFZ and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.81. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EFZ charges 0.95% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EFZ currently yields 3.98% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
EFZ and IVV share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EFZ or IVV?
EFZ has an expense ratio of 0.95% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EFZ or IVV?
Over the past year EFZ returned -16.15% vs +21.64% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), EFZ annualized -8.65% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EFZ or IVV?
EFZ has been the more volatile fund at 17.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EFZ -90.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EFZ and IVV?
EFZ and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EFZ and IVV?
EFZ and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EFZ or IVV?
EFZ yields 3.98% while IVV yields 1.09%, so EFZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.