EFZ vs SCHD
ProShares Short MSCI EAFE vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EFZ | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $10M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.98% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | -11.19% | +24.26% | |
| 1Y Return | -16.99% | +31.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -11.62% | +15.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -6.60% | +9.72% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.5% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -90.3% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2007 | Oct 20, 2011 |
EFZ vs SCHD Performance
ProShares Short MSCI EAFE (EFZ) is a ETF from ProShares and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year EFZ returned -16.99% while SCHD returned +31.38%. Year to date, EFZ is down 11.19% versus a gain of 24.26% for SCHD.
Over three years, EFZ compounded at -11.62% per year against +15.08% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are -6.60% and +9.72% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.39% annualized vs -8.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EFZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.5% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -90.3% for EFZ and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.76. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EFZ charges 0.95% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $6 annually, a gap of $89 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EFZ currently yields 3.98% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
EFZ and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 101 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EFZ or SCHD?
EFZ has an expense ratio of 0.95% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $89 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EFZ or SCHD?
Over the past year EFZ returned -16.99% vs +31.38% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), EFZ annualized -8.66% vs +11.39% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EFZ or SCHD?
EFZ has been the more volatile fund at 17.5% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: EFZ -90.3% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both EFZ and SCHD?
EFZ and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of -0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EFZ and SCHD?
EFZ and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 101 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EFZ or SCHD?
EFZ yields 3.98% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so EFZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.