EHCC vs IVV
Global X Ethereum Covered Call ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EHCC | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 10.57% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 0 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -20.12% | +13.43% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +22.61% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 1, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
EHCC vs IVV Performance
Global X Ethereum Covered Call ETF (EHCC) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, EHCC is down 20.12% versus a gain of 13.43% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.4% for EHCC and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EHCC charges 0.75% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EHCC currently yields 10.57% against 1.09% for IVV.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EHCC or IVV?
EHCC has an expense ratio of 0.75% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, EHCC or IVV?
EHCC yields 10.57% while IVV yields 1.09%, so EHCC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.