EHCC vs QQQ
Global X Ethereum Covered Call ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EHCC | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $1M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 10.57% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 0 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -19.91% | +19.68% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +26.75% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.4% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 1, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
EHCC vs QQQ Performance
Global X Ethereum Covered Call ETF (EHCC) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, EHCC is down 19.91% versus a gain of 19.68% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.4% for EHCC and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EHCC charges 0.75% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $18 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EHCC currently yields 10.57% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EHCC or QQQ?
EHCC has an expense ratio of 0.75% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, EHCC or QQQ?
EHCC yields 10.57% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so EHCC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.