EHCC vs VYM
Global X Ethereum Covered Call ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EHCC | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $1M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 10.57% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 0 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -20.34% | +16.10% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +25.99% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.35% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.4% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 1, 2026 | Nov 10, 2006 |
EHCC vs VYM Performance
Global X Ethereum Covered Call ETF (EHCC) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, EHCC is down 20.34% versus a gain of 16.10% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.4% for EHCC and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EHCC charges 0.75% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $4 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EHCC currently yields 10.57% against 2.86% for VYM.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EHCC or VYM?
EHCC has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $71 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, EHCC or VYM?
EHCC yields 10.57% while VYM yields 2.86%, so EHCC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.