EHCC vs VTI
Global X Ethereum Covered Call ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EHCC | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 10.57% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 0 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -19.91% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 1, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
EHCC vs VTI Performance
Global X Ethereum Covered Call ETF (EHCC) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, EHCC is down 19.91% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.4% for EHCC and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EHCC charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EHCC currently yields 10.57% against 1.07% for VTI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EHCC or VTI?
EHCC has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, EHCC or VTI?
EHCC yields 10.57% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EHCC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.