EIDO vs IVV
iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EIDO | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $473M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.63% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 72 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -31.27% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | -29.86% | +21.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -15.66% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -6.72% | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -67.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 5, 2010 | May 15, 2000 |
EIDO vs IVV Performance
iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF (EIDO) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EIDO returned -29.86% while IVV returned +21.64%. Year to date, EIDO is down 31.27% versus a gain of 13.72% for IVV.
Over three years, EIDO compounded at -15.66% per year against +21.55% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -6.72% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs -2.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EIDO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -67.0% for EIDO and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EIDO charges 0.59% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EIDO currently yields 3.63% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
EIDO and IVV share 1 holdings out of 572 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EIDO | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XTSLA | 0.14% | 0.15% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EIDO or IVV?
EIDO has an expense ratio of 0.59% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EIDO or IVV?
Over the past year EIDO returned -29.86% vs +21.64% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), EIDO annualized -2.42% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EIDO or IVV?
EIDO has been the more volatile fund at 23.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EIDO -67.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EIDO and IVV?
EIDO and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EIDO and IVV?
EIDO and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 572 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EIDO or IVV?
EIDO yields 3.63% while IVV yields 1.09%, so EIDO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.