EIDO vs IVV
iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, EIDO or IVV?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EIDO | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $492M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.29% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 72 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -28.40% | +12.70%Best |
| 1Y Return | -22.29% | +19.36%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -14.42% | +21.16%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -6.48% | +12.75%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.0% | 14.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -67.0% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $7,154 | $18,221Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 64.3% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 5, 2010 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 7, 2010 to Sep 8, 2026 (16.3 years).
EIDO vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.3 years both funds cover.
EIDO vs IVV Performance
iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF (EIDO) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EIDO returned -22.29% while IVV returned +19.36%. Year to date, EIDO is down 28.40% versus a gain of 12.70% for IVV.
Over three years, EIDO compounded at -14.42% per year against +21.16% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -6.48% and +12.75% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.08% annualized vs -2.17%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EIDO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.0% compared with 14.3% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -67.0% for EIDO and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EIDO charges 0.59% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EIDO currently yields 3.29% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
0.2% of EIDO's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.2% of IVV's money is in holdings EIDO also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 67 positions we hold weights for in EIDO and 504 in IVV, against full books of 72 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 492 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for EIDO (99.0% of the fund), and 1 for EIDO that do not appear in IVV (6.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EIDO | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XTSLABlackrock Cash Funds: Treasury, Sl Agency Shares | 0.19% | 0.18% | 0.01% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EIDO and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EIDO or IVV?
EIDO has an expense ratio of 0.59% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EIDO or IVV?
Over the past year EIDO returned -22.29% vs +19.36% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), EIDO annualized -2.17% vs +13.08% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EIDO or IVV?
EIDO has been the more volatile fund at 23.0% annualized versus 14.3% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EIDO -67.0% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both EIDO and IVV?
EIDO and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EIDO or IVV?
EIDO yields 3.29% while IVV yields 1.10%, so EIDO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than EIDO?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.