EINC vs IVV
VanEck Energy Income ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EINC delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EINC | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.46% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $75M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.47% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 33 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +29.87% | +12.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +35.63% | +20.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +28.64% | +22.10% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +24.15% | +13.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -93.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 12, 2012 | May 15, 2000 |
EINC vs IVV Performance
VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) is a ETF from VanEck and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EINC returned +35.63% while IVV returned +20.70%. Year to date, EINC is up 29.87% versus a gain of 12.96% for IVV.
Over three years, EINC compounded at +28.64% per year against +22.10% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +24.15% and +13.40% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.01% annualized vs -4.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EINC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -93.4% for EINC and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EINC charges 0.46% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $46 vs $3 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EINC currently yields 3.47% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
EINC and IVV share 4 holdings out of 531 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EINC or IVV?
EINC has an expense ratio of 0.46% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $43 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EINC or IVV?
Over the past year EINC returned +35.63% vs +20.70% for IVV, so EINC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), EINC annualized -4.44% vs +7.01% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EINC or IVV?
EINC has been the more volatile fund at 26.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EINC -93.4% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EINC and IVV?
EINC and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EINC and IVV?
EINC and IVV share 4 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 531 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EINC or IVV?
EINC yields 3.47% while IVV yields 1.10%, so EINC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.