EIRL vs IVV
iShares MSCI Ireland ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, EIRL or IVV?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EIRL led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 75.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EIRL | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $79M | $882.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.27% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 33 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +8.93% | +12.76%Best |
| 1Y Return | +19.62%Best | +15.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.32% | +22.95%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.09% | +13.54%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.8% | 14.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -48.3% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,755 | $18,869Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 75.7% | 38.1%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 5, 2010 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 7, 2010 to Oct 1, 2026 (16.4 years).
EIRL vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.4 years both funds cover.
EIRL vs IVV Performance
iShares MSCI Ireland ETF (EIRL) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EIRL returned +19.62% while IVV returned +15.57%. Year to date, EIRL is up 8.93% versus a gain of 12.76% for IVV.
Over three years, EIRL compounded at +17.32% per year against +22.95% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +8.09% and +13.54% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +9.00%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EIRL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.8% compared with 14.3% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -48.3% for EIRL and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EIRL charges 0.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EIRL currently yields 2.27% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
0.2% of IVV's money is in holdings EIRL also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in EIRL and 505 in IVV, against full books of 33 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 496 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for EIRL (99.0% of the fund), and 4 for EIRL that do not appear in IVV (9.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EIRL | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XTSLABlackrock Cash Funds: Treasury, Sl Agency Shares | 0.01% | 0.20% | 0.19% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EIRL and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EIRL or IVV?
EIRL has an expense ratio of 0.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EIRL or IVV?
Over the past year EIRL returned +19.62% vs +15.57% for IVV, so EIRL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), EIRL annualized +9.00% vs +13.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EIRL or IVV?
EIRL has been the more volatile fund at 19.8% annualized versus 14.3% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EIRL -48.3% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both EIRL and IVV?
EIRL and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EIRL or IVV?
EIRL yields 2.27% while IVV yields 1.06%, so EIRL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than EIRL?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EIRL led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 75.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.