EMXC vs VXUS

Quick Verdict

VXUS has a lower expense ratio. EMXC delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.

Lower Fees: VXUSHigher Returns: EMXCMore Diversified: VXUS

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEMXCVXUSWinner
Expense Ratio0.25%0.05%
AUM$23.5B$156.5B
Dividend Yield1.88%2.60%
Holdings6448,747
YTD Return+27.95%+14.19%
1Y Return+51.64%+27.38%
3Y Return (annualized)+25.21%+19.53%
5Y Return (annualized)+11.31%+9.03%
Volatility (annualized)19.0%15.1%
Max Drawdown-46.1%-39.9%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJul 18, 2017Jan 26, 2011

EMXC vs VXUS Performance

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMXC returned +51.64% while VXUS returned +27.38%. Year to date, EMXC is up 27.95% versus a gain of 14.19% for VXUS.

Over three years, EMXC compounded at +25.21% per year against +19.53% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +11.31% and +9.03% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, EMXC has the edge at +7.41% annualized vs +4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

EMXC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.0% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.1% for EMXC and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

EMXC charges 0.25% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $5 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMXC currently yields 1.88% against 2.60% for VXUS.

Holdings Overlap

13.2%overlap

EMXC and VXUS share 336 holdings out of 8106 unique holdings combined, representing a 13.2% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in EMXCWeight in VXUSDifference
2330:TW18.97%3.41%15.56%
000660:KR8.48%0.90%7.58%
2454:TW1.86%0.20%1.66%
2308:TWProProPro
2317:TWProProPro
RELIANCE:MBProProPro
402340:KRProProPro
ICICIBANK:MBProProPro
009150:KRProProPro
BHARTIARTL:MBProProPro
FundXLS Pro
See all 10 holdings EMXC shares with VXUS
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
X-ray my whole portfolio$45/quarter Pro · Cancel anytime

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, EMXC or VXUS?

EMXC has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $20 per year of difference.

Which performed better, EMXC or VXUS?

Over the past year EMXC returned +51.64% vs +27.38% for VXUS, so EMXC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), EMXC annualized +7.41% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, EMXC or VXUS?

EMXC has been the more volatile fund at 19.0% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: EMXC -46.1% vs VXUS -39.9%.

Should I hold both EMXC and VXUS?

EMXC and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between EMXC and VXUS?

EMXC and VXUS share 336 common holdings with a 13.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8106 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, EMXC or VXUS?

EMXC yields 1.88% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.