EMXF vs IVV
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EMXF delivered stronger 1-year returns. EMXF offers more diversification with 650 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMXF | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.17% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $165M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.81% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 650 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +19.68% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.34% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.88% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.27% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 6, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
EMXF vs IVV Performance
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EMXF returned +32.34% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, EMXF is up 19.68% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, EMXF compounded at +22.88% per year against +21.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +9.27% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, EMXF has the edge at +10.96% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMXF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.1% for EMXF and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMXF charges 0.17% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $17 vs $3 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMXF currently yields 2.81% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
EMXF and IVV share 1 holdings out of 1077 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EMXF | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XTSLA | 0.18% | 0.15% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMXF or IVV?
EMXF has an expense ratio of 0.17% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $14 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMXF or IVV?
Over the past year EMXF returned +32.34% vs +20.94% for IVV, so EMXF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), EMXF annualized +10.96% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMXF or IVV?
EMXF has been the more volatile fund at 16.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EMXF -33.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EMXF and IVV?
EMXF and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMXF and IVV?
EMXF and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1077 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMXF or IVV?
EMXF yields 2.81% while IVV yields 1.10%, so EMXF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.