EMXF vs VOO
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. EMXF delivered stronger 1-year returns. EMXF offers more diversification with 650 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMXF | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.17% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $165M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.81% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 650 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +20.07% | +13.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.74% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.04% | +22.16% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.32% | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.4% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 6, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
EMXF vs VOO Performance
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMXF returned +32.74% while VOO returned +21.62%. Year to date, EMXF is up 20.07% versus a gain of 13.20% for VOO.
Over three years, EMXF compounded at +23.04% per year against +22.16% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.32% and +13.42% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.51% annualized vs +11.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMXF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.4% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.1% for EMXF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMXF charges 0.17% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $17 vs $3 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMXF currently yields 2.81% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
EMXF and VOO share 0 holdings out of 1078 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMXF or VOO?
EMXF has an expense ratio of 0.17% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $14 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMXF or VOO?
Over the past year EMXF returned +32.74% vs +21.62% for VOO, so EMXF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), EMXF annualized +11.02% vs +13.51% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMXF or VOO?
EMXF has been the more volatile fund at 16.4% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: EMXF -33.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both EMXF and VOO?
EMXF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMXF and VOO?
EMXF and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1078 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMXF or VOO?
EMXF yields 2.81% while VOO yields 1.08%, so EMXF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.