EMXF vs QQQ
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, EMXF or QQQ?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
EMXF has a lower expense ratio. EMXF led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. EMXF is less concentrated, with 27.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMXF | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.16%Best | 0.18% |
| AUM | $172M | $498.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.68% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 587 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +24.21% | +24.32%Best |
| 1Y Return | +31.28%Best | +25.59% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.30% | +28.30%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.14% | +16.83%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2%Best | 20.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.1%Best | -35.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,208 | $21,766Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 27.8%Best | 47.2% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 6, 2020 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 13, 2020 to Oct 6, 2026 (6 years).
EMXF vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6 years both funds cover.
EMXF vs QQQ Performance
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EMXF returned +31.28% while QQQ returned +25.59%. Year to date, EMXF is up 24.21% versus a gain of 24.32% for QQQ.
Over three years, EMXF compounded at +25.30% per year against +28.30% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +10.14% and +16.83% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +17.83% annualized vs +11.40%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.0% compared with 16.2% for EMXF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.1% for EMXF and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMXF charges 0.16% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $16 vs $18 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMXF currently yields 2.68% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 557 holdings in EMXF and 102 in QQQ, totalling 99.6% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 557 positions we hold weights for in EMXF and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 587 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 96 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for EMXF (97.8% of the fund), and 6 for EMXF that do not appear in QQQ (0.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EMXF and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMXF or QQQ?
EMXF has an expense ratio of 0.16% while QQQ charges 0.18%. EMXF is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EMXF or QQQ?
Over the past year EMXF returned +31.28% vs +25.59% for QQQ, so EMXF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), EMXF annualized +11.40% vs +17.83% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EMXF or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.0% annualized versus 16.2% for EMXF. Worst drawdown: EMXF -33.1% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both EMXF and QQQ?
EMXF and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMXF or QQQ?
EMXF yields 2.68% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so EMXF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than EMXF?
EMXF has a lower expense ratio. EMXF led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. EMXF is less concentrated, with 27.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.