EPSB vs IVV
Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, EPSB or IVV?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EPSB led over 1Y, IVV over the full window. EPSB is less concentrated, with 26.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EPSB | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.88% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $5M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.15% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 59 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +15.22%Best | +14.15% |
| 1Y Return | +18.96%Best | +17.31% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.17% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.85% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.1% | 11.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -8.5%Best | -8.9% |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $13,309 | $13,931Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 26.0%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | Harbor Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 1, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 2, 2025 to Sep 21, 2026 (1.4 years).
EPSB vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
EPSB vs IVV Performance
Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF (EPSB) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EPSB returned +18.96% while IVV returned +17.31%. Year to date, EPSB is up 15.22% versus a gain of 14.15% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EPSB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.1% compared with 11.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.5% for EPSB and -8.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EPSB charges 0.88% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $88 vs $3 annually, a gap of $85 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EPSB currently yields 1.15% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
32.4% of EPSB's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.8% of IVV's money is in holdings EPSB also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
20 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in EPSB and 490 in IVV, against full books of 59 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 463 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for EPSB (97.8% of the fund), and 37 for EPSB that do not appear in IVV (64.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EPSB | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CRLCharles River Laboratories International Inc | 2.80% | 0.02% | 2.78% |
| TDYTeledyne Technologies Inc | 2.40% | 0.04% | 2.36% |
| RJFRaymond James Financial Inc. | 2.30% | 0.05% | 2.25% |
| CBRECbre Services Inc | 2.20% | 0.06% | 2.14% |
| SNASnap-On Inc. | 2.20% | 0.03% | 2.17% |
| CFCf Industries Holdings Inc. | 2.10% | 0.03% | 2.07% |
| HIIHuntington Ingalls Industries Inc. | 1.90% | 0.02% | 1.88% |
| MPWRMonolithic Power Systems Inc | 1.80% | 0.09% | 1.71% |
| DRIDarden Restaurants Inc. | 1.80% | 0.04% | 1.76% |
| ONOn Semiconductor Corp | 1.50% | 0.04% | 1.46% |
32.4% of EPSB is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EPSB or IVV?
EPSB has an expense ratio of 0.88% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $85 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EPSB or IVV?
Over the past year EPSB returned +18.96% vs +17.31% for IVV, so EPSB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), EPSB annualized +22.65% vs +26.72% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EPSB or IVV?
EPSB has been the more volatile fund at 13.1% annualized versus 11.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EPSB -8.5% vs IVV -8.9%.
Should I hold both EPSB and IVV?
EPSB and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EPSB and IVV?
32.4% of EPSB's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.8% of IVV's is in holdings EPSB also owns. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in EPSB and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, EPSB or IVV?
EPSB yields 1.15% while IVV yields 1.06%, so EPSB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than EPSB?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EPSB led over 1Y, IVV over the full window. EPSB is less concentrated, with 26.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.