EPV vs SCHD
ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EPV | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $10M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.94% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | -19.10% | +27.93% | |
| 1Y Return | -30.14% | +30.06% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -57.23% | +16.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -41.36% | +10.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 37.7% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.9% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 16, 2009 | Oct 20, 2011 |
EPV vs SCHD Performance
ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe ETF (EPV) is a ETF from ProShares and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year EPV returned -30.14% while SCHD returned +30.06%. Year to date, EPV is down 19.10% versus a gain of 27.93% for SCHD.
Over three years, EPV compounded at -57.23% per year against +16.25% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are -41.36% and +10.03% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.56% annualized vs -32.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EPV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.7% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.9% for EPV and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EPV charges 0.95% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $6 annually, a gap of $89 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EPV currently yields 4.94% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
EPV and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 101 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EPV or SCHD?
EPV has an expense ratio of 0.95% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $89 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EPV or SCHD?
Over the past year EPV returned -30.14% vs +30.06% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), EPV annualized -32.24% vs +11.56% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EPV or SCHD?
EPV has been the more volatile fund at 37.7% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: EPV -99.9% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both EPV and SCHD?
EPV and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of -0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EPV and SCHD?
EPV and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 101 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EPV or SCHD?
EPV yields 4.94% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so EPV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.