EPV vs VOO
ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EPV | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $10M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.94% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -19.10% | +13.25% | |
| 1Y Return | -30.14% | +19.96% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -57.23% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -41.36% | +12.81% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 37.7% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 16, 2009 | Sep 7, 2010 |
EPV vs VOO Performance
ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe ETF (EPV) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EPV returned -30.14% while VOO returned +19.96%. Year to date, EPV is down 19.10% versus a gain of 13.25% for VOO.
Over three years, EPV compounded at -57.23% per year against +21.27% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -41.36% and +12.81% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.49% annualized vs -32.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EPV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.7% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.9% for EPV and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.74. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EPV charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EPV currently yields 4.94% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
EPV and VOO share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EPV or VOO?
EPV has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EPV or VOO?
Over the past year EPV returned -30.14% vs +19.96% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), EPV annualized -32.24% vs +13.49% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EPV or VOO?
EPV has been the more volatile fund at 37.7% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: EPV -99.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both EPV and VOO?
EPV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EPV and VOO?
EPV and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EPV or VOO?
EPV yields 4.94% while VOO yields 1.08%, so EPV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.