ETW vs INCE

Quick Verdict

INCE has a lower expense ratio. INCE delivered stronger 1-year returns. ETW offers more diversification with 259 holdings.

Lower Fees: INCEHigher Returns: INCEMore Diversified: ETW

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricETWINCEWinner
Expense Ratio1.10%0.29%
AUM$936M$132M
Dividend Yield7.41%4.82%
Holdings29182
YTD Return+10.92%+15.94%
1Y Return+20.02%+26.30%
3Y Return (annualized)+15.89%+16.63%
5Y Return (annualized)+6.21%+10.93%
Volatility (annualized)16.9%13.8%
Max Drawdown-72.8%-34.1%
Fund FamilyEaton VanceFranklin Templeton Investments (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
InceptionSep 30, 2005Sep 20, 2016

ETW vs INCE Performance

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETW) is a ETF from Eaton Vance and Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year ETW returned +20.02% while INCE returned +26.30%. Year to date, ETW is up 10.92% versus a gain of 15.94% for INCE.

Over three years, ETW compounded at +15.89% per year against +16.63% for INCE; over five years the annualized figures are +6.21% and +10.93% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, INCE has the edge at +12.53% annualized vs -1.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

ETW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 13.8% for INCE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -72.8% for ETW and -34.1% for INCE. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ETW charges 1.10% per year while INCE charges 0.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $110 vs $29 annually, a gap of $81 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ETW currently yields 7.41% against 4.82% for INCE.

Holdings Overlap

6.9%overlap

ETW and INCE share 19 holdings out of 287 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.9% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ETWWeight in INCEDifference
CVX0.56%3.47%2.91%
PEP0.26%3.06%2.80%
RIO:LN0.45%2.28%1.83%
TTE:PAProProPro
RTXProProPro
PGProProPro
TXNProProPro
APDProProPro
KOProProPro
AZN:LNProProPro
See all 10 holdings ETW shares with INCE
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ETW or INCE?

ETW has an expense ratio of 1.10% while INCE charges 0.29%. INCE is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $81 per year of difference.

Which performed better, ETW or INCE?

Over the past year ETW returned +20.02% vs +26.30% for INCE, so INCE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), ETW annualized -1.13% vs +12.53% for INCE. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, ETW or INCE?

ETW has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 13.8% for INCE. Worst drawdown: ETW -72.8% vs INCE -34.1%.

Should I hold both ETW and INCE?

ETW and INCE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between ETW and INCE?

ETW and INCE share 19 common holdings with a 6.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 287 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, ETW or INCE?

ETW yields 7.41% while INCE yields 4.82%, so ETW currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →