FBYY vs IVV

FBYY vs IVV

Which is better, FBYY or IVV?

Leverage Strategy against Large Cap Blend.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFBYYIVV
Expense Ratio1.07%0.03%Best
AUM$197,078.97$850.0B
Dividend Yield63.47%1.09%
Holdings131,018
YTD Return-29.59%+10.70%Best
1Y Return-33.56%+11.31%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.04%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.65%
Volatility (annualized)16.8%12.9%Best
Max Drawdown-42.4%-8.9%Best
$10,000 over 1.1 years$6,002$11,363Best
Fund FamilyGraniteSharesiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleLeverage StrategyLarge Cap Blend
InceptionOct 21, 2025May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 21, 2025 to Nov 10, 2026 (1.1 years).

FBYY vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.1 years both funds cover.

FBYY vs IVV Performance

GraniteShares YieldBOOST META ETF (FBYY) is an ETF from GraniteShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FBYY returned -33.56% while IVV returned +11.31%. Year to date, FBYY is down 29.59% versus a gain of 10.70% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FBYY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 12.9% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.4% for FBYY and -8.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FBYY charges 1.07% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $3 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBYY currently yields 63.47% against 1.09% for IVV.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FBYY and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FBYYIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FBYY or IVV?

FBYY has an expense ratio of 1.07% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $104 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, FBYY or IVV?

Over the past year FBYY returned -33.56% vs +11.31% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), FBYY annualized -37.13% vs +12.32% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, FBYY or IVV?

FBYY has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 12.9% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FBYY -42.4% vs IVV -8.9%.

Should I hold both FBYY and IVV?

FBYY and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, FBYY or IVV?

FBYY yields 63.47% while IVV yields 1.09%, so FBYY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than FBYY?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.