FBYY vs QQQ
GraniteShares YieldBOOST META ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, FBYY or QQQ?
Leverage Strategy against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FBYY | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $197,078.97 | $437.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 63.47% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 13 | 208 |
| YTD Return | -29.70% | +12.98%Best |
| 1Y Return | -33.54% | +11.59%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.05% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.74% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7%Best | 22.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -42.4% | -14.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.1 years | $6,001 | $11,404Best |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Leverage Strategy | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 21, 2025 to Nov 11, 2026 (1.1 years).
FBYY vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.1 years both funds cover.
FBYY vs QQQ Performance
GraniteShares YieldBOOST META ETF (FBYY) is an ETF from GraniteShares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FBYY returned -33.54% while QQQ returned +11.59%. Year to date, FBYY is down 29.70% versus a gain of 12.98% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.3% compared with 16.7% for FBYY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.4% for FBYY and -14.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FBYY charges 1.07% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $18 annually, a gap of $89 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBYY currently yields 63.47% against 0.43% for QQQ.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FBYY and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FBYY or QQQ?
FBYY has an expense ratio of 1.07% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $89 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FBYY or QQQ?
Over the past year FBYY returned -33.54% vs +11.59% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), FBYY annualized -37.14% vs +12.69% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FBYY or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 22.3% annualized versus 16.7% for FBYY. Worst drawdown: FBYY -42.4% vs QQQ -14.8%.
Should I hold both FBYY and QQQ?
FBYY and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FBYY or QQQ?
FBYY yields 63.47% while QQQ yields 0.43%, so FBYY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than FBYY?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.