FBYY vs SPY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST META ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Which is better, FBYY or SPY?
Leverage Strategy against Large Cap Blend.
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FBYY | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.09%Best |
| AUM | $323,171.84 | $823.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 60.50% | 0.99% |
| Holdings | 12 | 1,515 |
| YTD Return | -29.87% | +13.12%Best |
| 1Y Return | -34.71% | +14.79%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.24% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.92% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7% | 12.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -42.4% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $6,218 | $11,486Best |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | State Street Investment Management |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Leverage Strategy | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2025 | Jan 22, 1993 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 21, 2025 to Nov 4, 2026 (1 years).
FBYY vs SPY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
FBYY vs SPY Performance
GraniteShares YieldBOOST META ETF (FBYY) is an ETF from GraniteShares and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year FBYY returned -34.71% while SPY returned +14.79%. Year to date, FBYY is down 29.87% versus a gain of 13.12% for SPY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FBYY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 12.7% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.4% for FBYY and -8.9% for SPY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FBYY charges 1.07% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $9 annually, a gap of $98 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBYY currently yields 60.50% against 0.99% for SPY.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FBYY and SPY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FBYY or SPY?
FBYY has an expense ratio of 1.07% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $98 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FBYY or SPY?
Over the past year FBYY returned -34.71% vs +14.79% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), FBYY annualized -37.82% vs +14.86% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FBYY or SPY?
FBYY has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 12.7% for SPY. Worst drawdown: FBYY -42.4% vs SPY -8.9%.
Should I hold both FBYY and SPY?
FBYY and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FBYY or SPY?
FBYY yields 60.50% while SPY yields 0.99%, so FBYY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SPY better than FBYY?
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.