FBYY vs VTI
GraniteShares YieldBOOST META ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FBYY or VTI?
Leverage Strategy against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FBYY | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $212,855.6 | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 58.31% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 6 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -27.90% | +11.65%Best |
| 1Y Return | -37.21% | +17.34%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.35% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.72% |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Leverage Strategy | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
FBYY vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FBYY vs VTI Performance
GraniteShares YieldBOOST META ETF (FBYY) is an ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FBYY returned -37.21% while VTI returned +17.34%. Year to date, FBYY is down 27.90% versus a gain of 11.65% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FBYY charges 1.07% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $3 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBYY currently yields 58.31% against 1.03% for VTI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FBYY and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FBYY or VTI?
FBYY has an expense ratio of 1.07% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $104 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FBYY or VTI?
Over the past year FBYY returned -37.21% vs +17.34% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FBYY or VTI?
FBYY yields 58.31% while VTI yields 1.03%, so FBYY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FBYY?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.